Journey Through Prism Overview

The recent excitement regarding the Prism 339 process merits an account of a user experience, so this is my journey through Prism.

This useful bank statement tool is likely to have considerable appeal to Insolvency Practitioners. It is not simply a schedule of bank transactions; it is much more. There are a lot of things that lawyers may find of assistance to assemble insolvency claims, but the end product provides the Insolvency Practitioner with an insight to further their required investigations.

The Prism Journey And End Product

Registering as a customer is no harder than writing an email, and opening a case no more challenging than dragging an attachment, but I was pleasantly surprised at the turnaround time of the file. Uploading the pdf was easy, and the transfer to Excel seemed flawless.

After brief perusal of the unpaid items in the first tab, I went to the transaction outliers tab, and filtered just to look at payments to associated parties (the output comes with highlighting already done). Whilst I already knew of some payments to Directors, more than I had notice of were revealed, as well as an associated company of which I was not aware.

A quick dip into the Associations tab showed both pieces of evidence needed – the Director of my own Liquidation was a person of significant control in the connected company (though not Director in Company B). One would hope to have discovered this in a normal SIP 2 analysis, but it is a helpful check.

Other tabs allowed me to quickly complete a review as part of SIP 2 compliance. Inevitably this is likely to speed up completing a Director Conduct Reporting Service questionnaire.

Plainly the ability to automate bank transactions to highlight anomalies in record time for this volume of bank statements is invaluable. As a small practice, the efficiency in time is critical.

In this case, not only is my compliance conceivably bolstered but there is the added luxury of passing Prism’s results to lawyers to progress further enquiries that may culminate in claims.

I imagine that Prism is likely to be a cornerstone supporting myself and many small practitioners, in both helping with compliance and swelling the assets of cases to look to enhance creditor returns. All that appears now perhaps needed is for Crown creditors or the Insolvency Service to agree to fund it!

Are you a UK company Director?

If you are a Director of an insolvent company or a bankruptcy, Oliver Elliot can help you. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.

We Know Insolvency Inside Out
Contact us for help

Share This Page!

What Next?

Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions in relation to Journey Through Prism then contact us as soon as possible for advice. Oliver Elliot offers a fresh approach to insolvency and the liquidation of a company by offering specialist advice and services across a wide range of insolvency procedures.

Our expertise is at your fingertips.

Name

By submitting this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by Oliver Elliot. For more details, please read our Privacy Policy.

Opt in

Disclaimer

This page is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. This article Journey Through Prism is provided for information purposes only. You can contact us on the specific facts of your case to obtain relevant advice via a Free Initial Consultation.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Invalid Companies Act Request Does Not Trigger Court Powers

Invalid Companies Act Request Does Not Trigger Court Powers

| Other | No Comments
The High Court has dismissed a claim brought by BCNO Limited after the company tried to obtain a “no access” order under section 117 of the Companies Act 2006. The…
The Aftermath Of An AI Trip To Court Over A Block Transfer Order

The Aftermath Of An AI Trip To Court Over A Block Transfer Order 

| Other | No Comments
There are many things a judge expects to see in block transfer order proceedings. A reworded version of an insolvency rule generated by what appears to be an AI assistant…
Norwich Pharmacal Jurisdiction Cannot Be Deployed To Sharpen Your Case

Norwich Pharmacal Jurisdiction Cannot Be Deployed To Sharpen Your Case

| Other | No Comments
A Norwich Pharmacal application sprouted in LCN Sapphire Trustee 1 Ltd & Anor v Wiseman & Ors EWHC 1839. No major surprises here from the judgment, as the case highlights…
How Your Beneficial Interest In Property Can Evaporate

How Your Beneficial Interest In Property Can Evaporate 

| Other | No Comments
Failure to pay the deposit can mean your beneficial interest in property evaporates. That is what happened to Mrs Katung (“Mrs K”) in Hamilton & Anor v Katung & Ors…
Elliot Green

Licensed Insolvency Practitioner & Chartered Accountant. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.

Leave a Reply