Skip to main content

Void For Want Of Authority

This short guide is about Director duties giving rise to agreements void for want of authority.

In this article, the key points are:

  • A Director acting in breach of duty entering into an agreement cannot deploy the same to bind a company.
  • The other party to such an agreement cannot reply upon Director authority when on notice that the act was undertaken in breach of duty.
Void For Want Of Authority

Void For Want Of Authority Overview

Directors do not have the ability to bind a company if they enter into an agreement in breach of Director duties.

Furthermore, the other party to such an agreement on notice that a Director is in breach of duties cannot rely upon a Director’s apparent authority in such circumstances. The agreement will therefore be void.

A Director acts as an agent of a company and agency law enables the principal to disavow a contract in such instances. The principal could if they so wish ratify the act complained about.

The Role Of Notice And Agency

In the case of O’Connell & Ors v LPE Support Ltd [2022] EWHC 1672 (Ch) the point was highlighted when an assignment was set aside for want of authority.

In considering the legal principles the Court referred to the well-known Maroo case involving Director transactions:

An agreement entered into by a director in breach of duty, where the other party has notice of the breach, will be void: GHLM Trading Ltd v Maroo [2012] 2 BCLC 369, per Newey J at [170]-[171]:

“[170] As for whether the transaction is binding, ordinary agency principles indicate that a company can disavow a contract which a director has caused it to enter into if: (a) the director was acting in his own interests rather than those of the company, its members or (where appropriate ) its creditors as a class, and (b) the other party to the contract had notice of the directors breach of duty. Thus, ‘Unless otherwise agreed, authority to act as agent includes only authority to act for the benefit of the principal’ (Bowstead & Reynolds, para 8-049). The transaction may also be open to challenge on equitable principles: ‘A contract made or acted on by an agent which is, to the knowledge of the other party involved, in violation of the agent’s equitable duties to his principal entitles the principal to equitable relief against the third party’ (Bowstead & Reynolds, para 8-217).

[171] The better view appears to be that, where a director has caused his company to enter into a contract in pursuit of his own interests, and not in the interests of the company, its members or (where appropriate ) its creditors as a class, and the other contracting party had notice of that fact, the contract is void rather than voidable: see eg Bowstead & Reynolds, paras 8-067 and 8-220, Richard Nolan, Controlling Fiduciary Power [2009] CLJ 293 esp at 317-319, Heinl v Jyske Bank (Gibraltar) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep (Banking) 511, and Hopkins v T L Dallas Group Ltd [2005] 1 BCLC 543. On this basis, it is hard to see how it could matter whether the requirements of s.239 of the 1986 Act are satisfied.”

Are you a UK company Director?

If you are a Director of a company concerned about Director transactions and duties then Oliver Elliot can help you. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.

We Know Insolvency Inside Out
Contact us for help

Share This Page!

What Next?

Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions in relation to Void For Want Of Authority then contact us as soon as possible for advice. Oliver Elliot offers a fresh approach to insolvency and the liquidation of a company by offering specialist advice and services across a wide range of insolvency procedures.

Our expertise is at your fingertips.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name

By submitting this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by Oliver Elliot. For more details, please read our Privacy Policy.

Opt in

Disclaimer: Void For Want Of Authority

This page Void For Want Of Authority is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. This article Void For Want Of Authority is provided for information purposes only. You can contact us on the specific facts of your case to obtain relevant advice via a Free Initial Consultation.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Directors Are Entitled To Accounting Records At All Times

Directors Are Entitled To Accounting Records At All Times

| Director Duties | No Comments
Directors are entitled to accounting records at all times. That is what Section 388(1)(b) of the Companies Act 2006 says and to prove the point is the case of Suzui…
Limits Of Directors’ Powers To Grant Inter-Company Loans

Limits Of Directors’ Powers To Grant Inter-Company Loans

| Director Duties | No Comments
The limits of Directors’ powers to grant inter-company loans were highlighted in the case of Northern Powerhouse Developments Ltd & Ors v Woodhouse EWHC 3124 (Ch). This was a case…
Should Directors Be Required To Sit A Test To Form Their First Company

Should Directors Be Required To Sit A Test To Form Their First Company?

| Director Duties | No Comments
Should Directors Be Required To Sit A Test To Form Their First Company Overview Should Directors Be Required To Sit A Test To Form Their First Company? The answer is…
The Creditor Duty And Its Effect On An Overdrawn Director’s Loan Account

The Creditor Duty And Its Effect On An Overdrawn Director’s Loan Account

| Director Duties | No Comments
Overview Of The Creditor Duty And Its Effect On An Overdrawn Director’s Loan Account The matter of the Creditor Duty and its effect on an Overdrawn Director’s Loan Account highlights…