What Is The Revesting Of A Bankrupt’s Home?

In the past, an individual who was insolvent and went into Bankruptcy at a time when their home may have been in negative equity could still lose it many years later but now there is the revesting of a Bankrupt’s home.

By virtue of the vesting of the Bankrupt’s property in the Trustee in Bankruptcy being automatic by virtue of Section 306 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the function of the Trustee with a duty to creditors to realise it, there were many cases of repossession of a Bankrupt’s home many years later. This was deemed unfair and stopped when Section 261 of the Enterprise Act 2002 brought in Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986.

In a post called Trustee’s Knowledge Of The Bankrupt’s Home was a reference to a case overseen by Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Curl KC which highlighted the Court’s assessment of this position as follows:

Section 283A was inserted into the IA 1986 by the Enterprise Act 2002. The problem at which it was directed was identified by Lawrence Collins J (as he then was) in In re Byford, decd [2003] EWHC 1267 (Ch), [2004] 1 P & CR 159, 163, subsequently cited with approval by the Court of Appeal in Lewis v Metropolitan Properties Realisations Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 448, [2010] Ch 148, at [18] as follows:

“…it is undesirable for trustees to wait for many years before resolving their rights in respect of the home of the bankrupt or his spouse. This [i.e. s.283A] introduces a general rule that the trustee must take steps to realise his interest in the home of the bankrupt or his spouse within three years of the bankruptcy, subject to specified exceptions. If he fails to do so the property vests in the bankrupt and the creditors lose all rights to it…”

As a result, no longer would a Bankrupt have to rely upon exceptional circumstances to stop repossession of their home by the Trustee in Bankruptcy. Now, if the Trustee has not either realised the home or commenced legal proceedings to take possession of it within three years of commencement of Bankruptcy, then Section 283A(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 kicks into effect and it ceases to be part of the Bankrupt’s estate under Section 283 of the Insolveny Act 1986 and revests in the Bankrupt.

The Trustee In Bankruptcy Repossession Duty

This presents a duty of the Trustee in Bankruptcy of the utmost seriousness as was highlighted in the post Section 303 Trustee In Bankruptcy Application Succeeds when His Honour Judge Paul Matthews in the case of Pateley Wood Farm LLP v Kicks [2002] EWHC 2973 (Ch) said: 

It is their job to advance the interests of the creditors against the bankrupts.

So if the Trustee in Bankruptcy does not take the appropriate action stipulated by the legislation to act in the interests of creditors and repossess the home then an action against them could arise through the tort of negligence. 

Bankrupt’s Duty To Inform Trustee Of The Assets

Compliance with the general disclosure duty that a Bankrupt has will typically start being tested when the Bankrupt is called upon by the Official Receiver under Section 291 of the Insolvency Act 1986 to flesh out full details of their assets and hand over their records. If assets are highlighted then it will be the norm for an Insolvency Practitioner (the Trustee in Bankruptcy) then to take over.

The Trustee in Bankruptcy then assumes office as a stranger to the affairs of a Bankrupt. There are only two ways in which the Trustee can become aware of the assets. Being informed of them or through discovery.

The starting point is that the Trustee in Bankruptcy does not assume office to be a detective notwithstanding a general duty to investigate. When conceivably forced into the position of forensic reviewer then the position of some of the difficulties of this can perhaps be seen by an earlier post Trustee In Bankruptcy Section 366 Costs which explored the case Horton v Eurobeam Services Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 173 (Ch) case. 

The starting point of the Trustee in Bankruptcy is to identify the Bankrupt’s assets through the Bankrupt themselves. As a result, it is a duty under Section 333 of the Insolvency Act 1986 for the Bankrupt to give information to the Trustee so that they can become aware of the assets they are charged with protection and realisation of.

Non-Disclosure By A Bankrupt Of A Property

In view of this position it is unsurprising that when Section 283A sprouted in the legislation, provision was made for a situation where a Bankrupt had not informed the Trustee of a relevant interest in a property. 

Indeed Section 238A(5) of the Insolvency Act 1986 says that the three-year time limit does not begin to run if, within three months of the commencement of Bankruptcy, the Bankrupt has not told the Trustee or Official Receiver about the same. Instead, the three-year period starts when the Trustee or Official Receiver becomes aware of the same.

What Next?

Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions in relation to Revesting Of A Bankrupt’s Home then contact us as soon as possible for advice. Oliver Elliot offers a fresh approach to insolvency and the liquidation of a company by offering specialist advice and services across a wide range of insolvency procedures.

Our expertise is at your fingertips.

Name

By submitting this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by Oliver Elliot. For more details, please read our Privacy Policy.

Opt in

Disclaimer: Revesting Of A Bankrupt’s Home

This page is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. This article Revesting Of A Bankrupt’s Home is provided for information purposes only. You can contact us on the specific facts of your case to obtain relevant advice via a Free Initial Consultation.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Can You Protect Your Assets From Creditors?

Can You Protect Your Assets From Creditors?

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
Can you protect your assets from creditors? No, you cannot shield your assets from creditors, such as by using a trust if it was done for the purpose of putting…
Former Wife’s Claim To Equity Of Exoneration Largely Fails

Former Wife’s Claim To Equity Of Exoneration Largely Fails

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
Former wife’s claim to equity of exoneration largely fails against Trustees in Bankruptcy, comes from the case of Armstrong & Anor v Harrow EWHC 1790 (Ch). The property known as…
How Bankruptcy Costs Can Avoidably Hoover Up All Realisations And Become Extremely Expensive

How Bankruptcy Costs Can Avoidably Hoover Up All Realisations And Become Extremely Expensive For The Bankrupt

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
The case of Armstrong v Temblett & Anor EWHC 1649 (Ch) demonstrates how bankruptcy can become very expensive for the bankrupt. This is particularly the case in circumstances when a…

How To Lose Your Passport In Insolvency Proceedings

| Bankruptcy, Liquidation | No Comments
The case of Umbrella Care Ltd (In Liquidation) v Raja EWHC 1973 (Ch) (“Umbrella”) is one in which the delicate matter of how to lose your passport in insolvency proceedings…