Proliferation Financing

There is now a requirement for relevant regulated persons to undertake a Money Laundering Proliferation Financing risk assessment due to The Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2022 which came into force on 1 September 2022. The risk assessment and policies and procedures have been inserted by virtue of Regulation 6.

What Is Proliferation Financing?

Proliferation financing means the act of providing funds or financial services for use, in whole or in part, in the manufacture, acquisition, development, export, trans-shipment, brokering, transport, transfer, stockpiling of, or otherwise in connection with the possession or use of, chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons, including the provision of funds or financial services in connection with the means of delivery of such weapons and other CBRN-related goods and technology, in contravention of a relevant financial sanctions obligation.

Reporting Of Material Discrepancies To Companies House

Under Regulation 9 The Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2022 it is a requirement when doing customer due diligence for a relevant person to obtain extracts from Companies House (to show what has been recorded on the register about persons with significant control and beneficial owners) and to report discrepancies in the information.

High Risk Countries For Money Laundering

Enhanced customer due diligence procedures are required under Regulation 33 of the The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.

On  14 November 2022 HM Treasury issued a notice an Advisory Notice that removes Nicaragua and Pakistan are no longer listed as a high risk countries requiring these extra checks.

Source Of Funds

Under Regulation 28(11) of The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 there is a requirement to validate the source of funds:

(11) The relevant person must conduct ongoing monitoring of a business relationship, including—

(a) scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of the relationship (including, where necessary, the source of funds) to ensure that the transactions are consistent with the relevant person’s knowledge of the customer, the customer’s business and risk profile;

(b) undertaking reviews of existing records and keeping the documents or information obtained for the purpose of applying customer due diligence measures up-to-date.

Are you a Director of a UK company?

If you are a creditor of an insolvent company or a bankruptcy, Oliver Elliot can help you. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.

Find out how
We Know Insolvency Inside Out

Share This Page!

What Next?

Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions in relation to Money Laundering Regulations September 2022 then contact us as soon as possible for advice. Oliver Elliot offers a fresh approach to insolvency and the liquidation of a company by offering specialist advice and services across a wide range of insolvency procedures.

Our expertise is at your fingertips.

Name

By submitting this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by Oliver Elliot. For more details, please read our Privacy Policy.

Opt in

Disclaimer: Money Laundering Regulations September 2022

This page Money Laundering Regulations September 2022 is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. This article is provided for information purposes only. You can contact us on the specific facts of your case to obtain relevant advice via a Free Initial Consultation.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Invalid Companies Act Request Does Not Trigger Court Powers

Invalid Companies Act Request Does Not Trigger Court Powers

| Other | No Comments
The High Court has dismissed a claim brought by BCNO Limited after the company tried to obtain a “no access” order under section 117 of the Companies Act 2006. The…
The Aftermath Of An AI Trip To Court Over A Block Transfer Order

The Aftermath Of An AI Trip To Court Over A Block Transfer Order 

| Other | No Comments
There are many things a judge expects to see in block transfer order proceedings. A reworded version of an insolvency rule generated by what appears to be an AI assistant…
Norwich Pharmacal Jurisdiction Cannot Be Deployed To Sharpen Your Case

Norwich Pharmacal Jurisdiction Cannot Be Deployed To Sharpen Your Case

| Other | No Comments
A Norwich Pharmacal application sprouted in LCN Sapphire Trustee 1 Ltd & Anor v Wiseman & Ors EWHC 1839. No major surprises here from the judgment, as the case highlights…
How Your Beneficial Interest In Property Can Evaporate

How Your Beneficial Interest In Property Can Evaporate 

| Other | No Comments
Failure to pay the deposit can mean your beneficial interest in property evaporates. That is what happened to Mrs Katung (“Mrs K”) in Hamilton & Anor v Katung & Ors…
Elliot Green

Licensed Insolvency Practitioner & Chartered Accountant. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.