Skip to main content

How To Claim HMRC Main Residence Relief?

To qualify for HMRC main residence relief for Capital Gains Tax purposes pursuant to Section 222 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 the following must be considered:

  1. whether the property was occupied as a residence
  2. nature and circumstances of residence
  3. the intention of the occupation ie. permanent or temporary
  4. need for continuity

This position has arisen from the Court of Appeal case of Goodwin v Curtis (70 TC 478) and later cases.

This issue sprouted in the case of MUMTAZ HUSSAIN v Revenue & Customs [2022] UKFTT 13 (TC). Mr Hussain did not elect the property at large here as his main residence. He claimed main residence relief on the basis of one year’s occupation and the last three years of ownership.

Was It A Hospital?

Mr Hussain purchased the former Mansfield General Hospital in July 1994. He sold it in July 2013.

The property was referred by the Tribunal as the Old Hospital.

It was not a hospital as the hospital moved to a new site in 1992.

Was It A School?

Well in 2001 part of the site was used as a school until 2002.

How Did It Become Mr Hussain’s Alleged Main Residence?

It was alleged by Mr Hussain that once the school closed down he started sleeping there each night and then moved out in 2003.

Planning Application

In 2005 Mr Hussain applied for planning permission to convert the site from use as a hospital to 133 apartments but in fact in 2013 he sold it to the Council for £1,800,000 which was far lower than two prior offers from developers that fell through of £5m and £7m.

HMRC said Mr Hussain’s involvement with property developers was consistent with the site as a property investment, not a residence.

The Tribunal’s Main Residence Relief Considerations

The Tribunal said that the property was not habitable as a dwelling; basic shelter was not sufficient and it was noted that there were complaints in newspaper articles by 2008 of the site being derelict.

No work to convert the property to residential use was evident from photographs taken in 2011.

Mr Hussain relied on photographs showing a bed and sofa. The Tribunal said no substantial move had been made to make it his main residence.

It appears that a property referred to as White House was his main residence both before and afterward.

Notably, the taxpayer agreed that it was not suitable for his wife to live in and the Tribunal said:

It appears from Mr Hussain’s evidence that it was not even suitable for her to be told of his plans for her to live in it.

The occupation dates appeared vague and there appeared insufficient documentation to back up the claim such as to banks, insurance companies etc.

Mr Hussain was married during the period so the Tribunal took note that they were not separated and that she had never visited the property and this was deemed an issue as a married couple may only have one main residence between them.

The Tribunal noted:

Mr Hussain variously said that she had never visited the Old Hospital, but also
that he took her to see the property shortly after he acquired it. His evidence was that she did not get out of the car, as the area was “too hairy”. This description of the area is again somewhat surprising given that Mr Hussain subsequently operated a school from the premises. Mr Hussain stated that he had never disclosed his plans for the Old Hospital to be the ‘family seat’ to his wife as it would distress her.

Result Of Main Residence Relief Claim

The Tribunal rejected Mr Hussain’s main residence claim.

Oliver Elliot Comment

In a nutshell, upon reading the Tribunal’s decision you might have thought that this was a rather weak case for main residence relief. This case highlights inconsistencies in approach and the lack of ability to source relevant documentation can be fatal to such claims.

Furthermore, the odds seemed to have been very firmly stacked against Mr Hussain’s application for relief here:

  • he was married and the concept of marriage does tend to suggest two people living together
  • the Council had not approved the site for residential use
  • an absence of documents to transfer mail to the site to show intention

Are you a taxpayer with a capital gains tax issue?

If you are a taxpayer, Oliver Elliot can help you address your claim and concerns arising from the main residence relief provisions.

Find out how

Share This Page!

What Next?

Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions in relation to How To Lose HMRC Main Residence Relief Claim then contact us as soon as possible for advice. Oliver Elliot offers a fresh approach to insolvency and the liquidation of a company by offering specialist advice and services across a wide range of insolvency procedures.

Our expertise is at your fingertips.

By submitting this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by Oliver Elliot. For more details, please read our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: How To Lose HMRC Main Residence Relief Claim

This page How To Lose HMRC Main Residence Relief Claim is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. This article How To Lose HMRC Main Residence Relief Claim is provided for information purposes only. You can contact us on the specific facts of your case to obtain relevant advice via a Free Initial Consultation.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Insolvency Service Talking Tough

Insolvency Service Talking Tough

| Liquidation | No Comments
The Insolvency Service Talking Tough? Boris Becker, once the world number one tennis player (winner of six Grand Slams) is now perhaps one of the most famous former tennis players…
Liquidator HMRC Tax Avoidance Claim

Blowing The Embers Of A Long-Abandoned Fire – Liquidator Tax Avoidance Claim

| Liquidation | No Comments
Liquidator Tax Avoidance Claim Overview A seemingly disappointing decision sprouted in the case of Hunt v Balfour-Lynn & Ors EWHC 784 (Ch) when a Liquidator tax avoidance claim did not…
Post Petition Payments In A Liquidation

Post Petition Payments In A Liquidation

| Liquidation | No Comments
Overview Of Liquidation Committee A Liquidation Committee is a number of the creditors of the company in Liquidation that in effect represent all of the creditors. Purpose Of A Liquidation…
Desire To Prefer

Desire To Prefer And Company Policy

| Liquidation | No Comments
Overview Of Desire To Prefer And Company Policy A case popped up on pancake Tuesday, Re De Weyer Ltd EWHC 395 (Ch) and at its heart was the desire to…
Elliot Green

Licensed Insolvency Practitioner & Chartered Accountant. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.