What Are Antecedent Transactions?

Undervalue and Preference transactions entered into prior to the insolvency that can be set aside by an Insolvency Practitioner in certain insolvency proceedings.

Antecedent Transactions: Undervalue and Preference

Transactions at an Undervalue

A Transaction At An Undervalue is a transaction within 2 years of the relevant insolvent date (in the case of bankruptcy that period can extend to 5 years) which appear to be for less than their money’s worth. Such transactions can be set aside by the officeholder of the insolvent estate for the benefit of creditors.

Typically such transactions will involve transfers of money or property to connected and or associated parties. The applicable statutory provisions are Section 238 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and Section 339 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Preferences

A Preference is a transaction within 2 years of the relevant insolvent date which appear to have put someone in a better position than which they ought to have been and influenced by a desire to prefer them.

Such transactions can be set aside by the officeholder of the insolvent estate for the benefit of creditors if certain insolvency and other criteria are met. Typically such transactions will involve transfers of money or property to connected and or associated parties.

The applicable statutory provisions are Sections 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or Section 340 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

Transactions Defrauding Creditors

Transactions that are known as transactions defrauding creditors have no limitation period. They are undertaken to put assets beyond the reach of creditors at an undervalue. Such transactions can be set aside by the officeholder of the insolvent estate for the benefit of creditors if certain insolvency and other criteria are met. The applicable statutory provision is Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

These are transactions that appear to be for less than their money’s worth. Such transactions can be set aside by the officeholder of the insolvent estate for the benefit of creditors.

Typically such transactions will involve transfers of money or property to connected and or associated parties.

GET IN TOUCH FOR HELP

For a free no obligation chat about any of the matters detailed above, please do get in touch for help. An expert will call you back or if you prefer exchange emails.

We can explore your situation and consider the best way to help you and your business needs. You can call us 020 3925 3613 or fill in the form below and will get back to you quickly. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.

Author: Elliot Green
Last Updated: August 17, 2026

contact-us-and-get-called-back-red1.png

Name

100% Confidential Advice
We Know Insolvency Inside Out

Civil Recovery Claims

Share This Page!

What Next?

Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions in relation to Antecedent Transactions: Undervalue and Preference then contact us as soon as possible for advice. Oliver Elliot offers a fresh approach to insolvency and the liquidation of a company by offering specialist advice and services across a wide range of insolvency procedures.

Our expertise is at your fingertips.

Name

By submitting this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by Oliver Elliot. For more details, please read our Privacy Policy.

Opt in

Disclaimer: Antecedent Transactions: Undervalue and Preference

This page is not legal advice and is not to be relied upon as such. This article Antecedent Transactions: Undervalue and Preference is provided for information purposes only. You should take independent advice on the facts of your case. No liability is accepted for reliance upon this post.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Write Off The Loan, Write In The Taxman

Write Off The Loan, Write In The Taxman 

| Director Transactions, HMRC, Liquidation | No Comments
There are occasions when tax law achieves something seemingly rather remarkable: it manages to be perfectly logical and yet may arguably produce some inconsistency at the same time. The recent…
Insolvency Practitioner Fees: When Nobody Can Mark the Homework The Judge Will Insolvency Practitioner Fees When Nobody Can Mark the Homework The Judge Will

Insolvency Practitioner Fees: When Nobody Can Mark the Homework The Judge Will

| Liquidation | No Comments
The recent Float Capital Ltd, In the Matter Of EWHC 1891 (Ch) judgment is not simply another decision about insolvency practitioners' remuneration. It is a reminder that where the normal commercial…
Liquidator’s Assignment Of Claims Challenged On The Basis Of Validity Of Appointment

Liquidator’s Assignment Challenged On The Basis Of Validity Of Appointment

| Liquidation | No Comments
The case of Henderson & Jones Ltd v Chambers & Anor (Re Priors Group Ltd) EWHC 1152 (Ch) involved dismissal of a summary judgment application issued by the applicant who…
Liquidator’s Claim Defeated By Disclosure Difficulty

Liquidator’s Claim Defeated By Disclosure Difficulty

| Liquidation | No Comments
Disclosure is an important part of litigation. At its core, it serves to function as a means of furthering attempts at a fair trial. The consequences of inadequate disclosure can…