Skip to main content

Want To Remove A Trustee?

If you are a creditor of an individual who has gone bankrupt then Oliver Elliot can help if you want to remove a Trustee In Bankruptcy. We Know Insolvency Inside Out.

We Know Insolvency Inside Out
contact us for help

Change Insolvency Practitioners

Share This Page!

Want To Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy?

What Is A Trustee In Bankruptcy?

Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy is the subject of this article. A Trustee In Bankruptcy is a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner who winds up the Bankruptcy Estate when an individual is the subject of a Bankruptcy Order.

Sometimes an individual’s creditors might have interests that they consider are not being furthered by a particular Trustee in Bankruptcy. In such circumstances, they might seek to remove or replace the Trustee in Bankruptcy.

How To Remove a Trustee In Bankruptcy is not always a simple procedure or popular one either. However, if creditors are unhappy with the Trustee (or any other office-holder) it is open to them to remove him or her from office.

Are you a dissatisfied creditor in a bankruptcy or some other insolvency process, seeking to consider how to replace or remove a Trustee in Bankruptcy and to have someone else take over for the creditors?

The Insolvency Act 1986 sets out the requirements for the Removal of Trustee in bankruptcy cases. Section 298(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 sets out the position.

If a creditor or creditors come together to seek to remove or replace a Trustee in Bankruptcy they can do so provided they by value are 25% or more of the bankrupt’s creditors.

How To Remove Or Replace A Trustee In Bankruptcy

Removal of a Liquidator can be effected in the following ways:

  • Application to Court
  • Requisitioning a Decision Procedure of the Creditors

It is the duty of a Trustee in Bankruptcy to be efficient, vigorous and unbiased and if the Trustee does not live up to this standard, then the court is likely to act without hesitation to remove him or her accordingly.

How To Apply To Court To Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy

Application to Court requires what is referred to as ‘just cause’ to remove a Trustee in Bankruptcy. Remove A Trustee in Bankruptcy is not intended to be a procedure capable of being deployed by creditors if they just fancy a changing of the guard or they have fallen out with the Liquidator for reasons unrelated to the Trustee in Bankruptcy’s material conduct in the administration of the insolvency estate (Liquidation, Administration, etc).

It would be very expensive if Trustees were replaced on a routine basis. Imagine the duplication of effort alone that would be required for a new Trustee in Bankruptcy to get up to speed on what has been going on and why the individual had gone bankrupt. Such costs would be at the expense of all creditors.

Consequently, if creditors want to remove the Trustee in Bankruptcy then they have to have good reason. But what is good reason?

What Is A Good Reason To Remove A Trustee?

Good reason or just cause will depend upon the facts of the case to remove a Trustee in Bankruptcy. The burden will be on the creditor applicant to show why the Trustee in Bankruptcy (or other Office-Holder) ought to be removed.

In general terms the Court will expect that the Trustee in Bankruptcy to have been efficient, vigorous and unbiased; if not the Court may exercise its discretion to grant removal. However, an effective and honest Trustee in Bankruptcy will usually not be removed. Misconduct itself is not a prerequisite for an application for removal to succeed.

An example of how the Court viewed “vigour” in a particular case, can be seen in the matter of Re Keypak Homecare Ltd [1987] BCLC 409 where Millett J said:

“If the liquidation had been conducted with any vigour at all, long before now the liquidator would be in a position either to allay the suspicions of the creditors or to lay papers before solicitors with a view to starting proceedings. Such proceedings might well include an application for the appointment of a receiver of Northern Brass Ltd. It need hardly be said that any such proceedings have to be conducted with great speed. Stock which has disappeared from one company is very likely to disappear from another under the same control.

“There is nothing that can be said against Mr Edgar so far as his personal integrity is concerned. There is no evidence of any misconduct or wrongdoing on his part, or of his intimacy or friendship with the directors of the company at all. He is a professional, independent, and experienced liquidator. But I am not impressed by his performance in the conduct of this liquidation. I take the view that his experience, gained in times when liquidators were accustomed to directors simply removing the stock before liquidation and then paying for them afterwards at forced sale values, has stood him in ill stead. As a result, he has adopted a relaxed and complacent attitude to such conduct, and in my judgment the creditors, who were outraged by what they believed had happened, were perfectly reasonable in the view that Mr Edgar was not likely to pursue the directors with anything like sufficient vigour. If that was the view they adopted at the meeting, then it has been amply confirmed by all that has taken place since. I, too, take the view that Mr Edgar is unlikely to pursue the directors with anything like sufficient vigour.”

“In circumstances such as the present, the creditors are entitled to expect either the suspicious matters to be cleared up very shortly after the creditors’ meeting, or proceedings to be commenced against the former directors with speed and pursued with vigour. A liquidator who can see from the statement of affairs that there are likely to be insufficient assets to enable him to discharge his duties ought to make the position clear at the meeting of creditors and insist on being authorised by those present at the meeting to take such steps as may be necessary. But simply to stand back and do nothing and then claim that that is justified by the lack of finance is not, in my judgment, good enough.”

How To Requisition A Decision To Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy

Requisitioning a Decision Procedure can be undertaken from compliance with Rule 15.18 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016. The key threshold to overcome is having 25% of creditors by value supporting your proposed resolution of creditors to remove the Trustee in Bankruptcy and to replace them with a person who has consented to act.

This procedure may well involve the need to pay a deposit as security for the costs of convening the procedure by virtue of Rule 15.19 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016. To require a deposit the Trustee in Bankruptcy will need to set out (within 14 days of the request to requisition the procedure), details of how the sum requested for the deposit is broken down.

So to remove a Trustee in Bankruptcy by creditors could be a phone call away or it could be a long way away; it could be unmerited and simply not happen at all. If you are a dissatisfied creditor do not suffer in silence if you have real and merited concerns, get in touch and Our CEO Elliot Green will consider the matter for you and give you the benefit of his view.

If you would like to explore your options in a case relevant to you then you can contact Our CEO Elliot Green by emailing him at or call us to speak to him on 020 3925 3613.

He will give you the time of day but this does not mean the other practitioner or Trustee in Bankruptcy should or indeed will be removed. The facts of each case need to be very carefully considered and there is no presumption one way or the other.

Trustee Not A Hired Gun!

Someone’s concerns and suspicions can sometimes takeover and objectivity can on occasion be lost. An Insolvency Practitioner is in effect a servant of the creditors, not their ‘hired gun‘ as a court has been known to promulgate as Mr Justice Lightman did in Ng v Ng (1998) 2 2 FLR 386, (1997) BCC 507:

“A trustee in bankruptcy is not vested with the powers and privileges of his office so as to able him to accept engagement as a hired gun.”

What Next? Expert Advice Is Just A Click Away

If you have any questions, queries or concerns in relation to this page Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy then Contact Us as soon as possible for advice. Our expertise is at your fingertips.


This page: Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Remove A Trustee In Bankruptcy is provided for information purposes only. You can Contact Us on the specific facts of your case to obtain relevant advice via a Free Initial Consultation.

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Bankrupt’s Set Aside Claim Hopeless And Bound To Fail

Bankrupt’s Set Aside Claim Hopeless And Bound To Fail Says Court

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
Bankrupt’s Set Aside Claim Hopeless And Bound To Fail Says Court was a claim by Mohammed Razeem against Vibhutiben Desai in respect of the case unsurprisingly named Razeem v Desai…
Application To Set Aside A Statutory Demand Failed

Application To Set Aside A Statutory Demand Failed

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
The application to set aside a statutory demand failed in the case of Staveley v Restis EWHC 670 (Ch) (“Staveley”). The statutory demand lodged by Victor Restis sought over £36…
IVA Proposal Fails To Stop Bankruptcy

IVA Proposal Fails To Stop Bankruptcy

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
The case of EFG Private Bank Ltd v Babaee (Re Insolvency Act 1986) EWHC 444 (Ch) highlighted how it might be an IVA proposal fails to stop bankruptcy. It is…
How Expensive Is Personal Bankruptcy?

How Expensive Is Personal Bankruptcy? The £6,000 Loss A Zeptosecond Later And How To Avoid It.

| Bankruptcy | No Comments
Overview Of How Expensive Is Personal Bankruptcy How expensive is personal bankruptcy and how can you possibly lose £6,000 in a zeptosecond?  If you go personally bankrupt then either you…

Recent Posts / View All Posts